10 Minutes a Day of Writing

I love writing. I always have, ever since I was a little kid, writing Christmas plays to be performed by my family members. Sometimes I "acted" in them as well, but often I just did the writing and directing. I was probably about 6 or 7 years old when I started this tradition (which has long since ended.) I used to write my own stories about another world, called "Archenland." Never mind that my favorite books were C.S. Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia, which included a neighboring country called Archland. I never published those stories, so I think I'm safe from lawsuits. I chose Advanced Composition as an elective my senior year of high school, and I was one of the only people excited about College Writing class my freshman year of college. I then decided I wanted to get a minor in Creative Writing, and signed up for a class with Bethel professor Mary Ellen Ashcroft. Unfortunately, Mono took over & eliminated a semester of school for me, so I had to settle for the double-major of Social Studies Secondary Ed/History & minor of Philosophy, losing the Coaching Minor & Creative Writing minor I wanted to add to my original goal of a Triple Major. I think I'm tired just thinking about all that

But I still love writing. And yes, I know sentences don't begin with "but" or "and." This is my blog though, not a term paper, so I'll write the same way my thoughts go, rather than following what the English books say is the proper way to form a sentence. I already took my ACTs & scored extemely high on the two sections about English & writing, so I have nothing further to prove. Now I can just write for me.

About 2 1/2 years ago, I got a concussion, giving me between 6 & 10 concussions, by my best attempt at a count, not to mention a few hundred sub-concussive head hits on the metal bar from my lofted bed my sophomore year of college. This concussion was different than the rest though. This messed up my brain cognitively, and while there have been improvements, it's still messed up. I used to read a book a day while on vacation. Now I read a book total in 2 weeks of vacation. I used to read 1-5 books a month at home. Now I have read 2 books in the past year. Writing is much more difficult as well. It takes a lot out of me to write simple things like this, which used to happen with ease. I have suddenly developed new spelling issues, and find myself writing the wrong versions of "you're" & "your" or writing a word that is similar to what I meant to write, yet isn't at all the correct word (taught instead of thought is one example). I know what is correct if I proofread it, but the wires are somehow messed up inside my brain now. Yet, I still love to write. The writing perfectionist in me has kept me from creating many blot posts, because I never feel like they are good enough. I'm going to overcome that now.

I am going to do my best to write 10 minutes a day for this blog, whether or not anyone else reads it. There are some days when my still healing brain won't allow that, but on most days, if I properly ration my cognitive endeavors, I should be able to write for 10 minutes. Who knows what I'll write about, and if it will be any good, but I want to do it, even if just to remind myself that I still enjoy writing, and that someday, when my brain is all healed, I want to make sure I write as much and as often as possible.

Today surpassed 10 minutes, but I will sleep soon to let my head gets some rest. My brain works much better when I don't have to analyze things or figure things out. Just spitting out words like this is much easier than even answering a simple question about how my head is going these days. However, I didn't say much of anything in this post, but the point is that I wrote something, and that means at this moment, no matter how many things I feel like I've failed to accomplish since the brain injury, I have successfully achieved one goal today, and that means more to me than I could ever express with written words.

A few random thoughts about Space Shuttle Families, Minnesota Twins, Tennis & more, sponsored by Insomnia

• STS-128, Space Shuttle Discovery, was scheduled to arrive back at Kennedy Space Center on Thursday night. They were only 8 minutes from the de-orbit burn, meaning they'd been in those super comfy orange suits for quite awhile & were all strapped down for landing, when weather made it a "no-go" for the night. These crew members had a few experiences sitting out on the launch pad in these same comfy suits (plus being stuck on their backs with gravity) for many hours before being scrubbed for lift-off due to weather. I asked STS-127 Commander Mark Polanksy, via twitter (@Astro_127), if it was mentally draining to not know when you are going to be able to take off, and I'm assuming his answer would apply to not knowing when you will be able to land as well. " Mentally, it's not bad. You know that you'll go-just not sure which day. It's harder on families." Somehow, while watching all that in the past, it never occurred to me how the families feel, not knowing if their wives/husbands/fathers/mothers/daughters/sons/brothers/sisters are going to be heading to space that day or returning home when scheduled. At least the astronauts have the excitement of a launch to think about at one end, and the amazing view of earth to watch while orbiting at the other end. So for the sake of the families waiting at home (especially Tim Kopra's in this case, as he has been on the Space Station for nearly 2 months), I hope Commander CJ Sturckow is given the "go" to land Discovery at KSC or Edwards Air Force Base for Friday afternoon/evening!
• The Kansas City Royals continue to show that regardless of how bad their team is, they can always come up big in the "spoiler" role in September. After the Tampa Bay Rays, who were desperate for wins to stay in the race, were swept by Detroit, the Royals went ahead and swept the AL Central leading Tigers. This could've been a huge boost to the Twins, who were 7 games back as of last weekend, as the Twins were in Toronto playing the long ago eliminated (at least in their minds) Blue Jays, but all they could muster up was a split, so they are still 5 1/2 games back. They are 3-4 in their last 7 games, against two teams between a .430 & .450 winning percentage. So thank you again to the Royals for helping out against the Tigers, but the Twins seem to be determined to be a .500 team.
• Roger Federer. 22 straight Grand Slam Semifinals. Previous record was 10 straight by Ivan Lendl. 22 straight. Nothing else needs to be said other than "22 straight Grand Slam Semifinals." Can he make it 6 straight US Open Championships?
• ABC's "Defying Gravity" does not appear in the listings after this Sunday night's episode, which is unfortunate, because what it lacks in reality, it makes up for with stories fun enough (or at least fun enough to rip on) to make it enjoyable to watch each week, especially when communicating with other people who love Space. If you are on Twitter, and have watched the show, make sure to check out the hashtag search of #defyinggravity on Sunday night. It seems to have had no publicity, so I'm not surprised the ratings are low. I watch ESPN & ESPN2 very regularly (sometimes 'round the clock), and have seen ads for many shows from their sister station ABC, but have never once seen an ad for Defying Gravity. That means ABC is slacking almost as much as Ron Livingston's much-loved character in Office Space! (Plus if it goes off the air, how will we ever find out how "beta" is making all these decisions, and if Maddux Donner & Zoe will end up together?)

I think I will now (again) attempt to get some sleep!

Random Thoughts about Joe Mauer, a Space Travel TV Show & the guy whose name is spelled wrong a lot

I've always felt that the MVP in a sport, in this case Major League Baseball, should come from a contending team, because how can one be the most valuable player if their team has no value in September? Hence, I was never terribly happy about Alex Rodriguez winning it with the Rangers during a down year for the team. However, watching Joe Mauer this year, as his numbers are rising this month (which should not be possible for a catcher in August), I might have to change my opinion. The Twins are still technically "in it" but they need to get more than 1 good start every 7 days if they'd like to cut into Detroit's lead. What Mauer is doing now though, is enough to transcend wins & losses.

He's leading the world in hitting, up to .383 after Tuesday's win over the Rangers, a team he has historically struggled against until this week (Ichiro is at .365, and Hanley Ramirez leads the NL at .359). He's on top of the MLB on base percentage list at .448; yes, he is currently ahead of the machine, Albert Pujols (.441). His Slugging percentage (.653) is behind Pujols, but is nearly 80 points ahead of the next AL competitor. If you had told anyone in baseball back in April that he'd be leading in BA & OBP now, they wouldn't bat an eye, but slugging? Naturally, his On Base + Slugging (OPS) numbers lead the AL at 1.101, just behind Pujols for MLB lead.

His 25 homeruns are tied for 17th in baseball, ahead of traditional sluggers Miguel Cabrera, Paul Konerko, Jim Thome & Alex Rodriguez. He's also tied for 11th in the AL for number of hits for the season, even though he missed an entire month! He's 8th in the AL for total bases - did I mention he missed one of the 5 months played? 20% of the season to this point?

I could keep talking about him for hours, but I'll spare you the pain of that. I'm sure in his spare time he's also rescued a baby from a burning fire and stopped a runaway train, but the media is too busy looking at his stats to have time to check out his activities outside of baseball. I just might be convinced that an MVP can come from a non-contender, though I hope the Twins make another late season push to make that a moot argument!

Now for the random thoughts:

• NASA and the Space Program is essentially an obsession for me right now, which my family & friends know all too well. I adored it as a kid, then sort of forgot that these missions were going on in outer space, and now, thanks to Mike Massimino being on Twitter, and Apollo 11's 40th Anniversary, I am catching up on everything I'd missed, before & after I was born. However, as I have watched 3 of the first 4 episodes of ABC's "Defying Gravity" about missions through the solar system 40+ years in the future, I pray that our real astronauts aren't like the "Grey's Anatomy in space" characters on this show. There seems to be a lot of, um, extra-curricular activity among these fictional astronauts. It is fairly entertaining so far though, so I think I'll stick with it, even if it's just to support a show about space travel. Plus I need to start watching it as it's shown, so I can see some of the hilarious comments on Twitter that occur under the hashtag #defyinggravity on Sunday evenings.
• Because we have all been bombarded by him today (and for months prior to that) I'll keep my Brett Favre thoughts to a minimum. I am on the side that is happy to see him in purple, as I feel like the Minnesota Vikings would once again fall short at the quarterback position, allowing defenses to stack the box to stifle Adrian Peterson. I don't expect #4 to be a savior, just to complete some passes to help open up the running game, which in turn opens up the opportunity for some fun long bombs to Bernard Berrian & Sidney Rice that we'd all enjoy seeing. Plus, anyone who can get on Twitter's trending topics list twice at the same time, is pretty impressive, even if it's due to half the country spelling his name correctly & the other half phonetically sounding out "Farve."
• University of Minnesota Football & Baseball player, Eric Decker, continues to make decisions & behave in ways that impress those around him. Now it's the Minnesota Twins, appreciating his honesty during their efforts to sign him (he was a 27th round pick of the Twins): http://bit.ly/uWtee I'm curious to see which sport he'll be in 5 years down the road, but I think he'll be successful in whatever he does.

That's all for now. Nothing too deep - just some random thoughts!

Why is Nick Punto playing?

While I must disclose that I am personally am a fan of Twins SS/2B Nick Punto because of his fielding, hustle & tenacity, I can’t quite understand why he’s seen so much playing time when he’s batting a paltry .209. Being a fan of someone does not mean I’m blind to numbers like that, so I did about 8 minutes of research. I was somewhat surprised what I found.

Punto’s on base percentage is .326. Who is above him? Mauer (.432), Morneau (.399), Kubel (.385), Span (.370), Cuddyer (.354), & another .209 hitter, Brian Buscher (.347; no wonder he pinch hits so often). If the top two spots in the batting order should go to guys with some speed, who get on base, then considering Kubel, Morneau & Cuddy are middle of the line-up guys (and have no speed anyway), it actually makes numerical sense for Punto to be at the spot, as much as he is struggling with hitting this year, unless the Twins wanted to move everyone up again to have Mauer batting 2nd. The goal is to get on base for the guys that come next. He didn’t have a good showing there in game 1 in Oakland (his 0 for night is what led me to look into why Gardy plays him so much), but even with those numbers from tonight, in terms of getting on base, he may actually be a better option than the other choices currently on the roster.

Since these numbers are for the whole season, and I think more recent play is always important when looking at stats, I also looked at his June & July numbers. Turns out in the past month & a half, he is batting .250 with a .369 on base percentage (which is just below Span’s .370 OBP for the season). Walks (logically) seem to be the key. While he’s only had 17 hits in that span (no pun intended), he has 16 walks as well.

Then I thought I’d see how the Twins do when he plays in the games, as winning would be the top goal. Since he has often been a late inning replacement in games where the Twins are leading, I only looked at games in which he had 3 or more plate appearances. This season, the Twins are one game above .500 overall, barely sneaking in with a .505 winning percentage. However, when Punto plays the majority of the, the Twins are 4 games above .500, with a .534 winning percentage. Huh. That doesn’t seem like a big difference, but game 163 last year showed the importance of each and every win. Maybe this Ron Gardenhire guy actually does know what he is doing.

Even as a Punto fan though, I would like to see him start getting some extra base hits again, as he only has 6 of those, and 0 triples. But if he can keep increasing his batting average and on base percentage throughout the year, and is batting in front of Mauer, Morneau, Kubel, Cuddyer, and/or Crede, he should start scoring a lot more runs, which would make everybody in Twins Territory happy!

As for the pitching debacle & less than shining defense in Oakland, topped off with a pathetic call on the game tying run for the Twins by an out of position umpire, well, I just don’t want to think about that game anymore.

Nick Punto Photo taken by me, Liz Strand, 05/03/07 at Tropicana Field, St. Petersburg, FL

What is Wrong with the Women's Tennis Ranking System?

Serena Williams just took her sister Venus out in straight sets, to win the Wimbledon Championship. She now holds 3 of the last 4 majors (US Open, Australian & Wimbledon), yet come Monday morning, Russia's Dinara Safina will still be in the #1 spot. This is the same Dinara Safina that Venus Williams demolished in the semis in straight sets, only letting Safina win 1 game! World #1 player only wins 1 game in a match, and she stays #1? On top of that, she has yet to win a Grand Slam championship. Is anyone else as confused as I am?

Tennis rankings for both men & women are a rolling system for the last 12 months. If you do better in a tournament than you did the year before, you'll gain extra points. If you do the same, you simply "defend" your points. If you do worse, you lose points. I'm not even going to get into how many points are awarded at each stage of each tournament, but if during those 12 months, one woman wins 3 of the 4 Grand Slams (and makes it to the QF of the other slam, losing to the eventual champion 6-7, 7-5, 5-7), something is very wrong with that system!

This is not to say that Safina has not had a good year; she has done well. She's made it further in slams, and won a few titles, including Rome & Madrid, but no one following tennis could look at that right now and say that she deserves to be #1. Just check out the transcript from Serena's post-match press conference for her thoughts about this: http://bit.ly/Zkmxh (scroll toward the end). She had the room laughing at the absurdity of it all.

The problem is that Serena and Venus don't play some of the other smaller tournaments throughout the year, as they have other interests & hobbies, which may be why they are still playing after so many women's players have burned out before hitting 25 years of age, but that is a subject for another time. However, there is no way you can convince me that the point system is weighted correctly when Serena Williams will not be #1 after winning 3 of the last 4 majors and getting to the quarterfinals of the 4th...there is no rationale or explanation that will satisfy me! The system is broken, just like Safina's serve was against Venus on Thursday, and it needs to be repaired.

Very Random Sports Thoughts: Manny playing early, Timberwolves trading & drafting, and my Twins

I have so many thoughts on my little iPod "Notes" app, of things I want to write about in the blog, but getting my healing brain to cooperate seems to be the issue. So I am going to put those notes aside, and just cover some current sports things on my mind, since they don't take a lot of deep & analytical thinking!

• I already complained about this on Twitter, but why does suspended Dodger Manny Ramirez get to have "rehab" games in the minor leagues before his 50 game suspension is up? He shouldn't be allowed to play anywhere higher than American Legion ball until the suspension is done. MLB says he can't talk to the media from the Dodgers clubhouse, but he's allowed to go get his swing back in the minors? If a player is tossed from a game, the player replacing him doesn't even get a warm-up throw, catch, etc (and it's not even the fault of the replacement player), but Manny can play AA ball? This is a suspension for failing a drug test, not a DL trip for a torn ligament. If he needs rehab games, it should happen after the suspension. Someone please explain to me how this makes sense.


• The Timberwolves are currently trying to make up for all their lost draft picks from the Joe Smith debacle in this one year (just to clarify, I liked & still like Joe Smith, but he is not the kind of player that one should risk a lengthy punishment to try to sign him early...), by picking up their 4th pick of the 1st round. The latest trade, sending Randy Foye & Mike Miller to the Washington Wizards for 3 players & the #5 pick, is ok with me, if that actually matters to anyone. I plan to write an expanded blog about Randy Foye's time with the Wolves, and the impossible situation he was in through no fault of his own, but I think it would help him to be somewhere where is not continually compared to Brandon Roy. Mike Miller just seemed to lose the shooting touch he'd always shown against the Wolves, once he was actually on his childhood favorite team. My personal opinion is that his "man bob" haircut was the reason he was struggling, since not many Minnesotan men wear headbands, but I have no scientific backing on that thought! Now the question is what the Wolves will do with these picks, which leads me to...


• Please don't package picks to get Hasheem Thabeet. I have nothing against Thabeet, and he seems like a nice enough kid. I just think the odds of him being a complete dud in the pros is larger than the odds of him being a star. This is based on watching him play against the Zags twice in the last 2 years, as well as watching a large number of Big East games during his tenure at UConn. He has some defensive presence, but I feel that in the NBA, that will be overshadowed by his lack of offensive skills. I think Stephen Curry, with his size issue, is a much better risk than Thabeet. Having said that, I'd be ok with the T-Wolves taking Thabeet at #5 or #6 if he is still there, as there is a shortage of big men in this draft, just not with them giving up picks to move up to #2 or #3 for him.


• Which draft picks would I love to see on the T-Wolves when it's all said and done? I'm not even going to include Oklahama stud Blake Griffin, as he will be gone, and I think the Wolves have a couple good building blocks at his position, in Kevin Love & Al Jefferson. I will be showing a bit of a bias here with a couple of them, but I'd love for them to get any of the following:
• Spain's PG Ricky Rubio - I think he is overrated, but should still be a solid player, with the potential to have some Steve Nash passing ability...though potential is not a guarantee. Ndude Ebi had potential too.
• Davidson's SG/PG Stephen Curry -small, but that shot is something that Wolves haven't had in...well...ever. Closest they came was the year Freddie Hoiberg was hitting 50% on 3's, but he wasn't as good at creating his shot.
• Syracuse PG Jonny Flynn - I rank him above Jrue Holiday & Tyreke Evans
• Duke SG Gerald Henderson which pains me to say, due to my anti-Duke stance, and memories of Christian Laettner, Cherokee Parks & Will Avery.
• Gonzaga SF Austin Daye - but this is primarily because of my Zags love. I think Daye needs a few more years & a whole lot more bulk due to his position.
• St. Mary's PG Patty Mills - I've seen him play in person 3 times, and even when he wasn't shooting well, his quickness blew me away. Plus, unlike every other college player in this draft, Mills has played against NBA All-Stars in the Olympics, when he played for Australia, and he more than held his own. How often do teams get a chance like that to see how a kid does when he is up against the best?
• Gonzaga PF Josh Heytvelt - No, this is not just because of my afore-mentioned bias...Heytvelt is more like Kevin Garnett than Al Jefferson (not in skill level, but style of play). He likes to play face-up to the basket. Plus he has a long range jump shot that becomes a match-up issue as a 6'11" player. Wolves could throw out an interesting Jefferson/Love/Heytvelt mix, and see if the opponent has enough big men to follow them all.
• Now for what wouldn't make me happy...Hasheem Thabeet before the #5 spot, James Harden, Jrue Holiday, Dejuan Blair or BJ Mullens.

• And now for my Twins...disappointing loss in Milwaukee, after a bad relay throw home allowed the game to be tied, and a bad decision by Pitcher Nick Blackburn allowing the go-ahead run to score. But the way Nick Blackburn has been pitching for most of this season, is something very fun to see! After surprising most of us in Game 163 at the Chicago White Sox (due to an absurd coin flip) with an almost perfect performance, he just seemed to pick up where he left off, trusting his stuff, and trusting his fielders. I love it!

• Everyone noticed that this was the first Milwaukee-Twins series to not be on a weekend, seemingly since Milwaukee was in the AL. Naturally the Milwaukee at Minnesota series was on the weekend, but I am convinced that Bud Selig was tired of seeing the Twins fans showing up at Miller Park, so he switched it to a mid-week series to make it a little tougher on the fans, so there wouldn't be so many Twins chants during the games. I think he's still bitter that he was unable to contract the Twins, and then they've "owned" his team ever since then. (Ok, perhaps I'm not really convinced of all this, but I like the theory anyway!)

• Finally, in what was a perfect birthday present for me, the Twins got rid of Luis Ayala on June 22. It's as if they granted me the wish when I blew out my candles! I just couldn't handle him as a pitcher (and admit that I did not have an open mind when he came to the Twins due to his play for the Mets last season), but to find out he was asking to be traded because he wanted to be the set-up guy and was mad he wasn't getting the 8th inning, and that wouldn't help for his contract for next year? Aside from the fact that Gardy wouldn't stand for that no matter what, why would the Twins give the 8th inning to a pitcher who let batters hit .353 with runners in scoring position (.306 overall), especially considering his 1st batter faced BA had to be over .500 (but I can't seem to find that stat anywhere) which increases the odds that a player will get into scoring position. Oh well. I no longer need to debate this, as it is all over now! Thank you Twins!

Why Federer's 14th Grand Slam win isn't Tarnished Just Because He Didn't Play Nadal (or his 13th, for that matter...)

I've already heard many media outlets asking if Federer's accomplishment means as much, as he's beaten people other than Nadal for the last 2 wins. It isn't Federer's fault that Nadal couldn't find his way to the Final for the 2009 French Open & 2008 US Open. Federer just keeps showing up, and will take on whoever is there to met him. In my personal (albeit not too important) opinion, this makes what he has accomplished even more impressive!

Roger Federer has now played in 20 straight Grand Slam semifinals. 20!!! The previous record was 10, set by Ivan Lendl. He has doubled this record, and could still add on to it. The ability to be that consistent is unbelievable, and I don't find too many things to be unbelievable. He made the semis of the 2008 Australian Open while battling Mononucleosis. I was curled up in bed doing nothing but eating whole Baker's Square Cookies n' Cream pies when I had mono (yet kept losing weight...could I get that again please?) . I took a semester off of college & my parents put a mattress on the pull-out couch upstairs, because I felt too weak to go up and down the stairs to my bedroom. He "struggled" his way to a Grand Slam semifinal match, where Novak Djokovic was able to send him back home. That ended his streak of 10 straight Grand Slam Finals. He had as many Finals in a row as Lendl had Semis in a row!

As mentioned earlier, this historic 14th Grand Slam is being discounted by some because it was not against Nadal. Nadal couldn't even make it to the quarterfinals of the tournament he had cruised through 4 years in a row, let along win it a 5th time. To me, this shows exactly how "otherworldly" Federer has been for the last 5-6 years. Athletes get injured, they get sick and they have "off" days mentally. It happens to everyone. Yet it never seems to happen to Federer when it matters most; or if it does happen, he is able to overcome and keep pushing.

Nadal has pulled out of next week's Queen's Club grass court tournament, in which he is the defending champion. Did knee pain keep him from defeating Robin Soderling last week? Perhaps, but nothing has kept Federer from being there in every Grand Slam Semifinal since mid-2004, and 15 of the last 16 Finals. In my mind, this flat out makes him better than anyone else currently playing (and perhaps anyone else ever...perhaps.)

Much has been made of the fact that Federer cannot be the greatest of all time if he has a losing record vs rival Nadal. Nadal has defeated Federer in 62% of their matches, so he must be better. Of course, James Blake has won 60% of his matches vs Rafa Nadal - does this mean Blake is better overall than Nadal? While James Blake is, and has been my favorite men's tennis player since Agassi retired, I would be silly to argue that he is better than Nadal. The 2008 Tampa Bay Rays went to the World Series for the 1st time in their history after winning 60% of their regular season games, yet they were 2-5 against the .500 Cleveland Indians. Know anyone (other than Indians fans) who would argue that Cleveland was the better team in '07? In these situations, we look at the big picture.

And this is the big picture: Roger Federer has tied Pete Sampras for the all-time record of 14 Grand Slams won. Unfortunately for stars from prior generations, like Rod Laver, who were pros when the Slams were for amateurs only, we'll never know how many titles they could have acquired. All we know is that no one has more Slams than Pete & Roger. Federer now has a Career Grand Slam, having won each major at least once. Only 6 men in tennis history have achieved this feat. Andre Agassi was the last one to do it, in 1999. Prior to Agassi, it hadn't happened since 1964. While Federer could not join Agassi in a so-called "Career Golden Slam" by adding an Olympic singles gold medal to the mix, he was able to win the doubles gold medal in 2008 in Beijing, with fellow Swiss player Stanislas Wawrinka.

I'm not arguing that Federer is the best ever - I don't feel I'm qualified enough to say that, because my knowledge of tennis history before my birth is not as strong as I would like it to be. Perhaps someday I will get Bud Collins' Tennis Encyclopedia and read it, and then decide who is the best ever, but even then, it would still be impossible to truly decide. I'm merely arguing that Federer's place in history, and the significance of his 13th & 14th Grand Slam victories, should not be minimized just because they were against someone other than Rafa Nadal. It's not as if Rafa stayed home and played poker instead of competing in those tournaments. He lost matches before getting to the final. He didn't make it, and Federer did!

As a fan of tennis, I would love to have seen another Nadal-Federer battle, so in terms of entertainment value, we as fans were cheated by the Federer over Murray and Federer over Soderling victories. But the value of these victories doesn't change. Find me a Boston Red Sox fan (or any baseball fan) who thinks their 2004 World Series victory was not as important because it was a not-so-entertaining sweep. Or a golf fan (or any sports fan) who thinks Tiger Woods' 2008 US Open playoff win was less significant because he was battling Rocco Mediate rather than Phil Mickelson or Sergio Garcia. You can only play the hand that's dealt to you...

Bonus: Plus he had some crazy fan run on the court toward him and it didn't seem to affect his play at all. We're talking about the sport where a "fan" of Steffi Graf ran on court during a changeover and stabbed Steffi's rival Monica Seles in the back, changing the course of Seles' career forever, so there is a precedent for this not turning out well. He had a clear moment of fear before realizing that guy was just stupid, but not psychotic, and didn't even bother taking a moment to sit down and collect his thoughts. He is that focused on the task at hand, that he could immediately flip the switch back to championship tennis.

(As a full disclosure, though I was wearing my navy blue Nike Roger Federer hybrid hat while watching the match on Tivo a few hours after it's completion, I have not been a long-time Federer fan. Only when he appeared human in early 2008, did I feel that tug to start pulling for him. I'm a sucker for underdogs. It was the same with Pete Sampras. I liked him, but he was never my favorite player, until the last few years of his career, when I even found myself cheering for him a few times over Agassi, who had always been my favorite; though I always did love his Wimbledon serve & volley, probably because I grew up loving Stefan Edberg & Boris Becker.)

Bipolar Twins & other Random Thoughts

I have been absolutely pathetic about blogging lately, and even if I have good reasons/excuses, I don't like it. So, I am just going to put some random thoughts together here, to make myself feel better, even if no one reads them!


Is there any sort of bipolar medication available for baseball teams? The Twins are about to head out on the road for a 10 game road trip. They have a league leading 21 wins at home (with 12 losses), but also have the basement all to themselves for road games, winning only 6 & losing 16. Only the NL Washington Nationals are worse on the road, but they are just as bad when they play at home. For people who like numbers, the Twins have won 64% of their games at home, and just 27% on the road. I thought perhaps they are just scared of playing outside (which they'd need to get over by next year), but they only claimed 1 of the 3 indoor games at Tampa Bay last weekend, so that's not it either.

I dug a little deeper into the stats (but only about as deep as I could dig in my old sandbox...which wasn't too deep), and still remain confused. Twins pitchers have a 4.59 ERA at home and a 5.16 ERA on the road. That half a run or so is not a huge disparity considering the staggering difference in the final results. Twins pitchers do give up many more walks on the road than at home (3.3/gm on the road, 2.4/gm at the Dome), but that hasn't translated into more earned runs. Opponents hit .275 against Twins pitchers at the Dome, and .272 in their own parks. Huh? No issue there. As for the Twins hitters, they bat .278 under the white baggy roof, and .263 when exposed to the outdoor elements (or the St. Pete catwalks & sting rays in the outfield).

So how can the team essentially have the same overall hitting no matter where they play, but have seemingly no clutch hitting when away from the friendly confines of home? (No, I don't actually expect that anyone will have the answer, but if you think you do, feel free to share!)

And now for the random thoughts:

• First thought is something I shared on Twitter a few days back, but I wanted more than 140 characters to elaborate. When it comes to the actual flavor of the food, I have always preferred Burger King to McDonald's, for burgers or breakfast options (although not for the fries). However, I so deeply despise their last few years worth of ads, that I might just decide to never eat there again. Guys dressed up as a burger & a chicken sandwich going after McDonald's, Wendy's & Subway? And while Ronald McDonald inspires smiles & thoughts of "his" charity work and the Ronald McDonald Houses, the Burger King King is, well, creepy at best!

• How does Serena Williams keep matching up with "cheaters" on the red clay of Roland Garros (otherwise known as the French Open, but they want to be cool like Wimbledon, which is not known as the British or English Open). In most sports, players will try to get away with whatever they can. NBA players act as if they have never fouled anyone...ever, when they know it was their elbow in someone else's gut. NFL offensive lineman try to hold their defensive match without the refs noticing. MLB fielders are happy to act as if they caught the ball on the fly, when they know it has grass stains on it from the short-hop it took before finding their glove. Golf & Tennis are different. In golf, players keep their own scorecard and have to be honest. In tennis, if the ball hits your arm rather than your racquet, and ends up being a winner, and the ump doesn't notice, you admit it, you don't turn away, smirk, and claim the point. Sort of like what Serena ran into with Justine Henin a few back, when Justine asked for "time" and Serena saw this and held up on her serving motion hitting the ball out. The Ump did not see this, and ruled it as being out, and Justine never said a word, even though replay clearly showed her hand asking Serena to wait (which Serena did not need to do, as the game is supposed to move at the server's pace, but she was being the good sport that tennis players are supposed to be on the court). The worst example may have been in men's tennis though, in last year's Olympics, the event built on good sportsmanship, when James Blake hit a shot to Fernando Gonzalez, which nicked the top of his racquet before flying past the baseline, which should've made it Blake's point. Once again, the ump didn't see it, and Gonzo just kept his mouth shut, which disturbed Blake, one of the nicest guys in sports - it takes a lot to irritate him!
  

• Is it my imagination, or have the Minnesota Twins had an awful lot of great games on days they aren't televised? I am quite thankful for the FS North Squeeze Play, so I can at least see those hits & runs, and add them to my little highlight videos that I keep for myself (because I listen to Bert's announcement each game about what I can't disseminate), but in this day & age, I should be able to catch every game on TV. I have MLB Extra Innings. If the local station doesn't want to show it, then the Cleveland broadcast shouldn't be a blackout! I also technically live far away enough from the Dome that it shouldn't be a blackout anyway, but because parts of my city are close enough, I fall under that blanket. But I digress...my point was that they've had some great games not on TV! Kubel's two 3-run homers in the first 2 innings today, Twins big comeback after Scott Baker collapsed in the 6th vs. the Tigers, Game 1 of the absurdly high scoring doubleheader in Chicago 2 years ago (which didn't even have a Squeeze Play!!), and these are just the ones off the top of my head.
  

• On Wednesday (June 3), Cleveland Indians pitcher Cliff Lee yet again jawed at Carlos Gomez for bunting. I like what Jim Souhan said during the FS North broadcast; something along the lines of "Telling Carlos Gomez to not bunt is like telling Johan Santana not to throw a change-up." Why is there an appropriate & inappropriate time to bunt? Considering the Indians came back from a 10-run deficit earlier this season, they should know better than any team that no lead is safe, and when there is no clock, no team is ever out of a game. So why is there a time that bunting is not ok? (Well, other than with 2 strikes, when you haven't done it successfully ever, or almost ever). Then after the game, Lee says he doesn't want to discuss it with the media. If you don't want to talk about it after the game, how about not running your mouth about it during the game either? Just a thought...
  

• Last week, thanks to DirecTV, I could watch live French Open tennis matches from 6 different courts. As long as my favorite players were not relegated to an obscure court with no cameras, I could watch the match of my choice at any time. However, if I wanted to watch Rafael Nadal battling Robin Soderling in the 4th round, eventually losing for the first time ever on Paris' red clay, I had to wait until the match had been over a couple hours, before being allowed to watch it on NBC. Now, as I write this, it is just a few hours until the Men's semifinal matches begin, but they are not available to watch live either, because NBC couldn't possibly shorten or cancel the Today show for a day. If they don't think the tennis ratings will outweigh the Today show, then why don't they let the real tennis fans watch it live on the Tennis Channel, and then they can show the replay to people who don't care if they know the results before watching the match. In the age of the internet, text messages, twittering, etc., having the semifinal of one of the 4 Grand Slam tournaments available only on tape delay, is simply unacceptable. Imagine how football fans would revolt if the NFL did that with a Saturday playoff game. Don't buy the exclusive rights to the match if you don't intend to show it live. (Thank you to ESPN2 for pushing ESPN First Take back a few hours on Thursday, so the Women's semis could actually be seen live!) Of course, those of you on the Pacific Coast (and perhaps the Mountain time zone too) experienced this frustration last year with each and every Michael Phelps "live" race from China, as NBC couldn't be bothered with showing it before prime time...except that by the time his races started, it actually was prime time on the West Coast too. Also unacceptable...and also NBC...but I'm guessing they don't care about my opinion!
  

That's all for now. Hopefully I will not leave so much time between my random thought sharing in the future!